Legal Opinion

Koike Aronson, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 16, 1997No. Court No. 96-04-00960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

Watson, Senior Judge:

The government has moved to dismiss this action under U.S.C.I.T. Rule 12(b) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The thrust of the motion is that the protest made to the Customs Service against the classification of the importations pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1514 was deficient because it did nothing more than identify the classification to which objection was made. It did not identify any preferred alternative or give any details about the nature of the objection or the reasons for it. The government points out that the defective protest gave Customs no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Needler's British Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Palmer Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American National Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  2. Chrysal USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  3. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API