Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Greenberg

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2013No. 2012-2066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Marc Norman Greenberg of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0077480, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2004. We suspended Greenberg’s license to practice law on November 23, 2010, on an interim basis pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4), upon receiving notice that he had been convicted of a felony. In re Greenberg, 127 Ohio St.3d 1437, 2010-Ohio-5690, 937 N.E.2d 117.

{¶ 2} Relator, Dayton Bar Association, charged Greenberg with violations of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(b) (prohibiting a lawyer from committing an illegal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. RidenbaughOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldblattOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Association v. BallatoOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Polizzi (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FuscoOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. NortonOhio Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API