Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harvey v. Robinson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 18, 1995Published

1DissentDana, Justice

I respectfully dissent. When determining a party’s gross income for purposes of computing child support payments the trial court “may include the difference between the amount a party is earning and that party’s earning capacity when the party voluntarily becomes or remains unemployed or underemployed, if sufficient evidence is introduced concerning a party’s current earning capacity.” 19 M.R.S.A. § 311(5)(D) (Supp.1994) (emphasis added). Consideration of earning capacity as opposed to present income is not mandatory and we should not disturb a court’s decision whether to consider earning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coons v. WilderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Finn v. FinnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  3. Rich v. NarofskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Tardif v. CutchinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API