Legal Opinion

Bennardo v. de Hillebranth

Yonkers City Court

Decided March 17, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Cacace, J.

Plaintiff landlord has brought this action for moneys allegedly due and owing under a commercial lease agreement with the defendant tenant. The dispute is over a fire insurance clause in the lease which purports to make the defendant liable for any increase in insurance premiums caused by its acts, including the mere use to which it put the premises. The pertinent part of that clause reads as follows: "Tenant at its sole expense shall comply with all rules, orders, regulations or requirements of the New York Board of Fire Underwriters, or any other similar body, and shall not do, or permit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hagopian v. BrandonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  2. Rose v. SchumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Rose v. SchumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vu Li Nieman v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API