Hansen v. City of Santa Rosa

THE COURT.

Appellant in his petition for a rehearing complains that in the decision filed in this ease (ante, p. 728 [270 Pac. 268]) the court failed to consider the rule as announced in the case of Southwest Paving Co. v. Wilson, 57 Cal. App. 251-255 [206 Pac. 776, 778], as follows: “That a particular description in the plans and specifications, which is at variance with the general description of the resolution of intention, creates an ambiguity which renders the proceedings void.”

*736Due consideration was given to this contention, although the point was not elaborated in the opinion filed. The…