Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 24, 2009No. 4507PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KONDUROS, J.:

Jomer Hill appeals his murder convictions arguing the trial court erred in admitting testimony of a police informant who was allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment on cross-examination. Hill further contends the trial court erred in failing to give a jury instruction permitting the jury to draw an adverse inference from the informant’s refusal to answer questions and in denying his motion for mistrial based on the solicitor’s closing argument. We affirm.

FACTS

Hill was convicted and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment for the murders of Ken Goldsmith and Trey Brown in December of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API