State v. Graham
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
Paul Graham (“Graham”) appeals his conviction for murder. Graham asserts, among other claims, that his Sixth Amendment right to confront the witness was violated. We agree.
FACTS
On the afternoon of January 25, 1992, Graham, “Tunch” Simmons, Steven Warren, Sr., and Jim Brabham (“Victim”) drank beer at a local boat landing. In the late afternoon, all of the men left the boat landing and returned to a fireworks stand on Highway 17, operated by “Tunch” Simmons. Steve Warren, Jr. was working at the fireworks stand that afternoon. Earlier in the day, the victim left two shotguns at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. CheeseboroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- State v. MizzellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.