Legal Opinion

Pope & Quint, Inc. v. Davis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1986No. 84-1066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This suit arose from an alleged breach of contract. The contract into which the parties entered was a real estate listing which granted Plaintiff, Pope Quint, the exclusive right to sell the residence of Defendants, Cecil and Virginia Davis. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendants, and it is from the ensuing judgment that Plaintiffs appeal.

FACTS

On October 21, 1981, the Davises listed their residence on Springbank Road in Mobile for sale through Pope Quint, a real estate agency. The terms of the listing agreement granted Pope Quint the exclusive right to sell the residence, and called…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Merchants & Mfrs., Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Whitehead Forest Products v. HugginsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Worthey v. WortheyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Pope & Quint, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API