Legal Opinion

Higdon v. Carlebach

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1957No. Docket 73, 74, Calendar 47,074, 47,075Published

1Opinion of the Court

348 Mich. 363 (1957)

83 N.W.2d 296

HIGDON

v.

CARLEBACH.

Docket Nos. 73, 74, Calendar Nos. 47,074, 47,075.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 17, 1957.

Joseph Marvaso, for plaintiffs.

Moll, Desenberg, Purdy & Glover, for defendants.

BLACK, J.

These are consolidated actions for negligence occurring, as alleged, in the course of dental treatment. One is brought by plaintiff Sandra R. Higdon in her own right. The other, derivative from the first, is brought by Sandra's mother.

Sandra's cause is a striking duplicate of Vale v. Noe, 172 Wis 421 (179 NW 572); and Ellering v. Gross, 189 Minn 68 (248 NW 330).…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Barnowsky v. HelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Evans v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API