Raymond v. Estate of Wooleenden
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Appeal from the disallowance of claims in probate court. Claimant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Claimant filed three claims against this *166estate. They were disallowed by the commissioners on claims, and on appeal were disallowed by the jury. Only' two of the claims are insisted upon here:
First, it is claimed that in 1887 claimant held a contract in writing from Dr. Lyster, of Detroit, for the purchase of certain lands at $30 a foot front, the contract amounting at that price to $7,080. She had paid $50 down, when, by the advice of Mr. Woolfenden, she released her contract, and permitted her vendor to make a contract with William T. De Graff. Under this contract it is claimed that Mr.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Hinckley v. McLaughlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1918