Legal Opinion

Saichek v. Lupa

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2003No. 93615, 93774 consPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick

delivered the opinion of the court: The sole issue in this appeal is whether a plaintiff who has brought an action against two defendants to recover damages for a single, indivisible set of injuries arising from concurrent but independent acts of negligence may continue with her claim against the first of the defendants after being awarded and paid the full amount of damages she proved following entry of a default judgment in her favor against the second defendant. The circuit court held that she could not and dismissed her claim against the first defendant pursuant to section 2 — 619 of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Nowak v. St. Rita High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Dillon v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Arteman v. Clinton Community Unit School District No. 15Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Fremarek v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Thornton v. GARCINIIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  2. J.L. v. BarnesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Thomas Janusz, Jr. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Thornton v. GarciniAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. American Service Insurance v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API