State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellant Larry Louis Jackson seeks reversal of his conviction for aggravated robbery or a new trial. Jackson maintains the trial court should have suppressed a voluntary statement given when he allegedly was in custody in violation of the prompt arraignment rule, the trial court erred in admitting Spreigl evidence and the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain the conviction. We affirm.
FACTS
According to the victim’s testimony, she was about to enter her parked car at 10 p.m. on December 14, 1989 when a man with an object in his hand came up to her and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. WibergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. EllingsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of M.E.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991