Legal Opinion

Ramer v. Wright

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 3, 1916No. 8799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court. Hon.' Charles O. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

On the 26th day of June, 1915, the respondents filed with petitioner, John E. Ramer, as Secretary of State, a petition to refer to the vote of the People of Colorado, House Bill No. 178,. being an act of the Twentieth General Assembly, relating to the Practice of Medicine. *54Within fifteen days thereafter, and on the 19th day of July, 1915, there was filed with the Secretary of State what purported to be a protest against said petition.

A motion to dismiss the protest was filed with and overruled by the Secretary of State. Upon the hearing, the Secretary of State sustained the protest, and held…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kelly v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Bickerdike v. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Contested Election of CusickLackawanna County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1890
  4. Loeb v. Smith Bros. & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. Miller v. CarakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brownlow v. WunschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Adams v. HillColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Dalbey Bros. Lumber Co. v. CrispinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. In Re Initiative Petitions Nos. 112, 114, 117, 118Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API