Legal Opinion
Walker v. Kelly
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 27, 1973No. File No. CV 11-6811-3867PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.
The plaintiff, on behalf of himself .and his minor son, Michael Walker, hereinafter referred to as Michael, brought this action against the defendants, parents of Sharon Kelly, their minor daughter. The plaintiff alleges that Sharon wilfully and maliciously assaulted Michael, causing a laceration over his right eye. The defendants in their answer deny the alleged assault and in a special defense allege that Sharon was five years of age and incapable of acting deliberately, wilfully and maliciously.
The action was brought under § 52-572 of the General Statutes, the pertinent part of which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bianco v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Sharkey v. SkiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Hess v. Dumouchel Paper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Rogers v. DoodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Lentine v. McAvoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gianetti v. RutkinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Hanks v. BoothSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Red Rooster Constr. Co. v. River Assoc., No. 29 06 33 (Jul. 2, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991