Legal Opinion

Isaac Owens v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 19, 2018No. 17-3416PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kanne, Circuit Judge.

*972 Isaac Owens used Testim, a topical gel containing 1% testosterone, sporadically for two years. During this time, he developed deep vein thrombosis. He sued Testim's manufacturer, alleging that the drug caused the condition. To show causation-a necessary element of all of his claims-Owens planned to rely on the testimony of Dr. Jihad Abbas. The district court excluded Dr. Abbas's testimony and, as a result, granted summary judgment in favor of the drug manufacturer. Owens appeals the district court's decision to exclude his expert's testimony and grant summary judgment.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Clyde Ammons v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Michael Durkin and Loretta Reed, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Equifax Check Services, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Brandon Stollings v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Ervin v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. William B. Shipley v. Chicago Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Viamedia, Inc. v. Comcast Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Anderson v. KennedyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Brown v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  5. Hostetler v. Johnson Controls IncDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API