Legal Opinion

In re the Appointment of a Committee of the Person & Property of Zirt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 20, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAulisi, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, Sullivan County, which directed that the question of respondent-appellant’s ineompeteney be tried by a jury and that he submit to a preliminary psychiatric examination. The controlling statute, section 101 of the Mental Hygiene Law, which became effective in 1963, in pertinent part provides: “(3) Contents of petition. The petition shall be verified and, insofar as can be ascertained with reasonable diligence, shall state facts showing incompetence; * *s * (5) Triai on issue of ineompeteney. Unless the court decides, in the exercise of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dobie v. . ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Dobie v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. In re the Application for the Appointment of a Committee of the Person & Property of ClarksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. In Re the Application for the Appointment of a Committee of the Person & Property of ClarksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API