State v. Daniels
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChief Justice Exum
I concur with the majority in rejecting defendant’s assignments of error relating to the guilt phase of his trial. I cannot agree, however, *289with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court did not err in admitting the testimony of Dr. White at the sentencing proceeding. I believe this error warrants a new sentencing proceeding.
Since the majority opinion fails to recite thoroughly the evidence presented at the sentencing proceeding I shall summarize that evidence here.
The State’s evidence consisted primarily of the testimony of Dr. Cynthia Bernice White, an expert in psychiatry. Through her…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.