Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Daniels

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 25, 1994No. 506A90Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChief Justice Exum

I concur with the majority in rejecting defendant’s assignments of error relating to the guilt phase of his trial. I cannot agree, however, *289with the majority’s conclusion that the trial court did not err in admitting the testimony of Dr. White at the sentencing proceeding. I believe this error warrants a new sentencing proceeding.

Since the majority opinion fails to recite thoroughly the evidence presented at the sentencing proceeding I shall summarize that evidence here.

The State’s evidence consisted primarily of the testimony of Dr. Cynthia Bernice White, an expert in psychiatry. Through her…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API