Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Education, Commack Union Free School District v. Ambach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 1986Published

1DissentLevine, J.

I respectfully dissent. The issue on respondent Joseph B. Margolin’s appeal to respondent Commissioner of Education was purely one concerning construction of a common, management prerogative clause of the collective bargaining agreement which Margolin’s bargaining representative, the Commack Teachers’ Association (CTA), negotiated and entered into. Margolin’s appeal to the Commissioner occurred only after he had voluntarily elected to invoke the grievance machinery of the agreement, exhausted all of his remedies thereunder and received an unfavorable result. No overriding issue of educational…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3 of Huntington v. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Civil Service Bar Ass'n v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. MATTER OF DYE v. New York City Transit Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API