Legal Opinion
Hodgson v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1971No. 71-1096PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The principal1 issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in finding that the defendants were subject to the minimum wage standards of § 6(b)2 and the maximum hours standards of § 7(a) (2)3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended by the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1966, rather than the higher standards of §§ *5176(a) (l)4 and 7(a) (l)5 of the Act as amended.
The Secretary of Labor brought this action against the defendants to enjoin them from violating 29 U.S.C. §§ 206(a) (1) and 207(a) (1) (Supp.1971), and to restrain them from continuing to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Shultz v. MorrisDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1970
- Johnnie Lee Wilcox v. Smullian Building Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Bereuter's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Hodgson v. Eunice Superette, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1973
- Brennan v. Patio Cleaners, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974
- Hodgson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Bereuter's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983