Muhammad v. State

Melton, Justice.

Following a jury trial, Hakim Muhammad appeals his conviction for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, and tampering with evidence. Muhammad contends that the evidence was insuffi cient to support the verdict and that the trial court erred by admitting similar transaction evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the record shows that, in the fall of 2009, Muhammad and his wife Shelia separated. On October 17, 2009, Shelia rented a house that was in short walking distance from the couple’s former…