Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Evansville Vanderburgh Building Commission

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2000No. 87A01-9902-CV-40PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Sr. Judge

David and Nancy Gibson (“the Gibsons”) appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the Evansville Vanderburgh Building Commission (“Building Commission”) and the Evansville Vanderburgh Area Plan Commission (“APC”). The Gibsons raise two issues for our review, which we restate as:

I. Whether the Building Commission’s and the APC’s motions for summary judgment were repetitive, and thus, should have been summarily denied.

II. Whether the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of the Building Commission and the APC pursuant to the Indiana Tort…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ramon v. Glenroy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Biggs v. MarshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Indiana Department of Correction v. StaggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stonacek v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. BD. OF COM'RS OF COUNTY OF HARRISON v. LoweIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. James T. Mitchell v. 10th and the Bypass, LLC, and Elway, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Linden v. Health Care 2000, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API