Legal Opinion

People v. Helgesen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 5, 2004No. 2-02-0879PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Defendant, Sean R. Helgesen, appeals the summary dismissal under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 et seq. (West 2002)) of his “Motion to Vacate Void Judgment.” Defendant contends that the trial court should have treated the motion as a petition under section 2 — 1401 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1401 (West 2002)), which contains no provisions for summary dismissal. In the alternative, he contends that we must reverse the dismissal because the court failed to adhere to the procedural requirements of the Act. Because we hold that the court had…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. People v. GaultneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Woods v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. ShellstromIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. People v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API