Legal Opinion
Litvak v. Fabi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 28, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*632In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated December 11, 2003, which granted the motion of the defendant Keybank USA NA for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against the defendant Keybank USA NA, and, upon searching the record, summary judgment on the issue of liability is conditionally granted to the plaintiff as against that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Sullivan v. SpandauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Lacy v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ryan v. SobolevskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zegarowicz v. RipattiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Talat v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Merchants Insurance Group v. Mitsubishi Motor Credit Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Them-Tuck Chung v. PintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Allstate Insurance v. PersampireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.