Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 10, 1982No. CM 441840PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Judge:

The appellant was convicted of committing an indecent, lewd, and lascivious act and an indecent assault, and communicating indecent and insulting language to a female, all in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (U.C.M.J.), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976). His approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months and reduction to Private E-l.

I. Indecent, Lewd, and Lascivious Act

The appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction of committing an indecent, lewd, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. KickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. MayoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. HobbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. United States v. McCormickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Able v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. GipsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  5. United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API