United States v. Johnson
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FOREMAN, Judge:
The appellant was convicted of committing an indecent, lewd, and lascivious act and an indecent assault, and communicating indecent and insulting language to a female, all in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (U.C.M.J.), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1976). His approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months and reduction to Private E-l.
I. Indecent, Lewd, and Lascivious Act
The appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction of committing an indecent, lewd, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. KickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. MayoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HobbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. McCormickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Able v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. GipsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.