Legal Opinion

In Re Lobar

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1993No. 92-SP-490PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

On March 13, 1992, respondent Mark A. Lobar pled guilty to a charge of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, 1 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1988). Pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 10(c), this court suspended respondent from the practice of law in the District of Columbia by order dated April 27, 1992. We further ordered the Board on Professional Responsibility to institute a formal proceeding to determine the nature of the final discipline to be imposed. The Board recommended respondent’s disbarment pursuant to D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989), which requires disbarment of any attorney convicted of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of BondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Matter of MeisnereDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Matter of RobersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. In re Kuang Hsung J. ChuangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re SquillacoteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. In Re GormleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. In Re RobbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. In re HuffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API