Legal Opinion

Miller v. National Benefit Ass'n.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1942No. File No. 8513PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P.J.

The defendant has appealed from an order granting the plaintiff a new trial. The evidence offered at the trial was not in dispute and based upon this evidence the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The grounds upon which a new trial was ordered are set forth in the order granting plaintiff a new trial, as follows:

“1. The grounds urged and set forth in the Plaintiff’s application for new trial which is referred to and by this special reference made a part hereof, and particularly,
“2. The insufficiency of the evidence to support the findings of fact and conclusions of law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Houck v. HultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. In re Estate of RobertsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hayden v. City of SissetonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petersen v. PetersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Miller v. HansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Brooks, Inc. v. BrooksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Brooks, Inc. v. BrooksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API