Legal Opinion

Olea v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1969No. Civ. 33126PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, Acting P. J.

This appeal is taken by Southern Pacific Company from the judgment entered upon the verdicts of the jury in these two consolidated actions for wrongful death. These actions arose out of the railroad crossing accident in which Predric and Ronald Olea were killed. The assignments of error to which appellant has devoted substantial argument are presented under two headings phrased as follows: (1) “The issue of wilful misconduct should not have been submitted to the jury;” and (2) “There was no basis for instructing on the doctrine of imminent peril.” We have concluded that the evidence presented…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reuther v. ViallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pelletti v. MembrilaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Chappell v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Levizon v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. McHale v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. LueckArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lostritto v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Simmons v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Morgan v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API