Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Beardsley

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Petition for an injunction; brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County, and reserved upon facts found for the advice of this court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

This is a petition for an injunction. The petitioner is a proprietor upon the west shore of the harbor of Bridgeport; upon his lot he has constructed upon piles a wharf extending over mud-flats toward the channel; upon this he has a large quantity of lumber and a mill for dressing it; vessels come from the natural channel to this wharf through one excavated by him; his premises are valued at 150,000. The respondents are also proprietors upon the west shore of Bridgeport harbor; they have constructed a wharf upon the eastern portion of their lot, and have partially completed a platform from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Company for Erecting & Supporting a Toll Bridge v. Connecticut River Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  2. Whittlesey v. Hartford, Providence & Fishkill RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Barker v. MintzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Watson v. New Milford Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  4. Fisk v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. Mitchell v. Southern New England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API