Legal Opinion

Mills v. Singletary

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 1, 1998No. 96-3506PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Per curiam

In this capital case, appellant Gregory Mills challenges the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The Florida Supreme Court described the circumstances surrounding the murder of James Wright and Mills’s trial as follows:

The evidence at the trial showed that Gregory Mills and his accomplice Vincent Ashley broke into the home of James and Margaret Wright in Sanford between two and three o’clock in the morning, intending to find something to steal. When James Wright woke up and left his bedroom to investigate,…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Ted Herring v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Virgil Lee Brownlee v. Michael HaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. PratherCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Tarver v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. Mills v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API