Legal Opinion

Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 21, 2013No. 11-3750PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge.

In 2009, Appellant Ryan Hart (“Appellant” or “Hart”)1 brought suit against Appellee Electronic Arts, Inc. (“Appellee” or “EA”) for allegedly violating his right of publicity as recognized under New Jersey law. Specifically, Appellant’s claims stemmed from Appellee’s alleged use of his likeness and biographical information in its NCAA Football series of videogames. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee on the ground that its use of Appellant’s likeness was protected by the First Amendment. For the reasons set forth below, we will…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Samuel Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Michael Davis v. Electronic Arts Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Pellicano v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Eloise LaBarre v. Bristol Myers SquibbCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API