Legal Opinion
Bullock v. Cuyler
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 15, 1978No. Civ. A. 78-120PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Glenn C. Bullock (“Bullock”), a prisoner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the custody of the Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction, brought this civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to redress the deprivation of rights secured to him by the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Specifically, Bullock alleges that his civil rights were violated when defendant Julius T. Cuyler (“Cuyler”), Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- John Fulford v. Frank Klein, Etc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- John Fulford v. Frank Klein, Etc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Wallace v. HewittDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neustein v. OrbachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Thomas v. Beth Israel Hospital Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Wright v. CuylerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Thomas v. CuylerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Wright, Thomas v. Cuyler, Julius T., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Wright, Thomas v. Robinson, William B., Commissioner of the Bureau of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Cuyler, Julius T., Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pa. Sims, Daniel T., Deputy Superintendent of Treatment of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pa. Reid, Lawrence, Director of Treatment of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980