Legal Opinion

State v. Ollivier

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 2011No. 63559-0-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 — It is not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to grant multiple continuances to ensure that defense counsel is adequately prepared even though the defendant objects to the majority of those continuances. Brandon Ollivier also raises additional issues, none of which have any merit. We affirm.

FACTS

¶2 Brandon Ollivier is a registered sex offender. In March 2007, he was living with two roommates, both of whom were registered sex offenders. While in police custody for a community custody violation, Eugene Anderson, one of Ollivier’s roommates, gave a taped interview to Detective Dena…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State Of Washington v. Mark Besola And Jeffrey SwensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State of Washington v. Kevin Wade ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
  4. State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API