Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Antonio Hughes

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2013No. 12-60005Published

1DissentKing, Circuit Judge

The parties entered into a plea agreement whereby the government agreed to continue Counts 2-5 of the indictment after Hughes pleaded guilty to Count 1, and move to dismiss Counts 2-5 at sentencing. Presented with such an agreement, Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure required the district court to inform Hughes whether it accepted or rejected the plea agreement. If it rejected the plea agreement, the court had to give Hughes the opportunity to withdraw his plea. The record does not clearly disclose whether the district court accepted or rejected the plea agreement. It thus is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API