Legal Opinion

Arlington Mfg. Co. v. Celluloid Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 22, 1899No. 30PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

BRADFORD, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree sustaining letters patent No. 546,360, issued September 17, 1895, to Stevens & Harrison, and No. 542,452, issued July 9, 1895, to Thurber & Schaefer. Both patents are owned by the appellee. The defenses are lack of novelty and of invention and non-infringement. This appeal has twice been argued, by reason of the retirement of Judge Butler from the bench after the first hearing and before a conclusion was reached as to the disposition of the case.

The claims of patent No. 546,360 are as follows:

“1. The method of producing a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. BoisselierSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foss v. OglesbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. Swan v. ThompsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  3. In re BraseltonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API