Legal Opinion

Blair v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1964No. Nos. 3398, 3399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

These are appeals from convictions for negligent homicide1 and operating a motor vehicle, at an unreasonable speed.2 We dial first with the threshold question of whether appellant was entitled to a stenographic transcript of the trial proceedings at government expense. Appellant contends this is a question which seriously affects the administration of justice in the District of Columbia.

The record reveals that after filing a timely notice of appeal appellant moved in this court for a stenographic transcript at government expense.3 In support of the motion he filed an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Burke v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frank A. Tate v. United States of America, Robert M. Edelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API