George Nooner v. The Pillsbury Company v. Mark Fitzsimmons, David Schroeder and Wayne Rieschel
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
George Nooner appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court 1 for the Western District of Missouri granting summary judgment in favor of Pillsbury Co. (Pillsbury). For reversal, Nooner argues the district court erred in granting summary judgment in Pillsbury’s favor because as a matter of law Pillsbury committed the torts of false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
The facts are undisputed. In December 1983 Pillsbury, through its general counsel, retained…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Holloway v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Rustici v. WeidemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hardge-Harris v. PlebanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
- Stever v. Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Stever v. Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Nielsen v. Crane Co. Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992