Legal Opinion

State v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 14, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error to the Gloucester county Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Magie, Chancellor.

This writ brings up a judgment of the Supreme Court affirming the conviction of plaintiff in error in the Gloucester Quarter Sessions upon an indictment for the illegal sale of liquor.

The case was presented to the Supreme Court upon a writ of error and assignments of error. The “entire record" of the trial was not brought up under section 136 of the Criminal Procedure act of 1898. Pamph. L., p. 915.

The sole ground for reversal disclosed by the argument in this court is fouuded on the fifth assignment of error, challenging the refusal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. Moschell v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  3. Stockton ex rel. Smith v. ReganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fooshee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State v. NarushefNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  4. New Jersey v. CorriganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905
  5. Greif v. Betsy Ross Ice Cream Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API