Legal Opinion
New Jersey v. Corrigan
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided July 28, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions
On Indictment. On motion to remand to the state court.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
Application is made by the Attorney General of this state, upon notice to the petitioners, to remand to the state court for trial an indictment found against them in the Middlesex county court of oyer and terminer, which has been removed to this court. The record was brought into this court during the present term. Counsel for the defendants raises the point that the motion to remand is premature, for the reason that the petitioners have until the first day of the next term in which to file the record in this court, and that until that time this court has no…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Gibson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hill v. Woodland Amusement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1908
- People v. Fajardo CardonaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1915