Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Devegter and Richard Poirier, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 1, 2000No. 99-8142PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
The Government appeals the district court’s partial dismissal of the indictment against Appellees, Michael deVegter and Richard Poirier, Jr. The indictment charged Appellees with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and wire fraud and honest services fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 & 1346. Appellees moved to dismiss the indictment. The district court granted the motion in part, dismissing the § 1346 counts on the ground that the allegations in the indictment were insufficient to charge violations of that section. The Government argues…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Frank AnticoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Charles W. Walker, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.