Legal Opinion

Ochman Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1950No. Appeals, 206, 207 and 208PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb, Justice Jones,

These appeals are from several judgments, each of which amends the respective jurat to the “Qualified Elector” affidavit on the particular nominating petition in issue and directs that the petition, as so amended, be received and filed by the county board of elections of Philadelphia County. As the appeals raise the same question, they will be dealt- with in one opinion.

The objections of the respective appellants to the nominating petitions in question are the same, viz., that some of the requisite number of electors’ signatures to the petitions were subscribed, as…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination Petition of JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. In re Nomination Paper of NaderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. In Re NaderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. In Re Petition to Set Aside Nomination Petitions of BenkoskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API