Legal Opinion
People v. Mungo
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 2012No. Docket No. 269250PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON SECOND REMAND
2Per curiam
i. OVERVIEW
This case is before this Court for the third time for reconsideration in light of Davis v United States.1 This case has a tortuous and monstrously complex procedural history stretching out behind it. We believe that it helps, in framing the issue, to summarize that history in something approaching plain English. For ease of reference, we have delineated each of the three stages of this case sequentially and numerically; that is, Mungo I,2 Mungo II,3 and Mungo III.4
Initially, the circuit court suppressed the evidence: a gun for which defendant Michael Mungo did not…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Thornton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- People of Michigan v. Glorianna WoodardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re Contempt of DorseyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- People of Michigan v. Chad James DonaghyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- State of Tennessee v. Corrin Kathleen ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 2016