Legal Opinion
Dold v. County of Niagara
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal brings up for review two orders of the Niagara Special Term, one denying defendant’s motion to dismiss, under section 181 of the Civil Practice Act, and rule '156 of the Buies of Civil Practice, for failure to prosecute, and the other, under section 476 of the Civil Practice Act, and rule 112 of the Buies of Civil Practice, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss all of the causes of action in the complaint, other than the first, and so much of the first which alleges or seeks money damages.
The Special Term’s denial of the first motion should be affirmed. We reach the conclusion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Syracuse v. . HoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Lowe v. LoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Winter v. . American Aniline Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn v. AltmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Pfeffer v. KlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1953
- Mintzer v. Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Franklin v. Rumsey Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Sutton Factors Corp. v. SingerNew York Supreme Court · 1962