Legal Opinion

Karger v. Armour & Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 4, 1936No. 6687PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

In this action plaintiff has declared in a count in tort and a count in contract. Plaintiff now waives her count in . contract, and the case is before the court upon defendant’s demurrer to the first count.

This count alleges that the defendant is engaged in the business of slaughtering hogs and preparing and selling meats intended for human consumption, which meats the defendant sold to retailers.

Plaintiff further alleges that she purchased from a retailer pork chops which the retailer had obtained from the defendant. “The plaintiff says the defendant sold the said…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farrell v. Manhattan Market Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Windram Manufacturing Co. v. Boston Blacking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Holt v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Lebourdais v. Vitrified Wheel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Tonsman v. GreenglassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Linda Batiste v. Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2015
  2. Whitethorn v. Nash-Finch Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API