Legal Opinion

Manne v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1946No. 13183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDDICK, Circuit Judge.

The question is whether sums paid to the taxpayer under nine contracts with insurance companies were received as annuities under annuity or endowment contracts within the meaning of section 22(b) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S. C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 22(b) (2). The statute and regulations involved are printed in the margin.1

Each of the contracts in question was purchased by the taxpayer for a lump sum and was entitled “Annuity Contract.” In each contract the insurance company agreed to make periodical payments of a stated sum to the taxpayer during his life, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. White v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waller v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  2. Caldwell v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
  3. Wilson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  4. Waller v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  5. Wilson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API