Legal Opinion

Okamura v. Advincula

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1922No. Nos. 1412 and 1413Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

The plaintiff! instituted two actions of assumpsit in the district court of Koolauloa on the Island of Oahu, one for the sum of $177.85 and the other for the sum of $206.30, exclusive in each instance of interest, attorney’s commissions and costs. Both actions were for goods sold and delivered. In each case there were several counts, or, as plaintiff there called them, causes of action. All of the counts were based upon written orders in the same form but naming different recipients of the goods to he sold by the plaintiff. The following is a sample of these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. RedhouseHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Corby v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  4. Lucas v. Le CompteIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Borngesser v. HarrisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API