Legal Opinion

State v. Arnett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1964No. 14330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This is a suit for reinstatement as an attorney by Louie Arnett, under the provisions of Art. XII, Sections 32 and 33, of the State Bar Rules, Art. 320a — 1, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. The State of Texas, acting by and through its Grievance Committee of the State Bar of Texas, contested the application of Arnett, and after a hearing before the District Court the petition of Louie Arnett was granted, and an order rendered reinstating him to the right to practice law in this State, from which judgment the State of Texas has prosecuted this appeal.

Appellee’s petition for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re AndreaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In re HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
  3. In Re Petition of Leo Stalnaker for ReinstatementSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Steere v. State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Ratcliff v. State Bar of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  4. Alexander Sonnenschein v. Augustin Rivera, Jr. Teresa Ereon Giltner Harold Odom Barbara Ellis Anna M. McKim Cynthia Eva Hujar Orr C. Alfred MacKenzie Dwaine M. Massey And Carlos R. Soltero In Their Official Capacities as Members of the Texas Board of Law Examiners, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2023
  5. Augustin Rivera, Jr., Teresa Ereon Giltner, Harold Odom, Barbara Ellis, Anna M. McKim, Cynthia Eva Hujar Orr, C. Alfred MacKenzie, Dwaine M. Massey, and Carlos R. Soltero, in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Texas Board of Law Examiners v. Deborah Sonnenschein, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API