Legal Opinion
Eppinger v. Sealy
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 18, 2009No. 5D08-4286PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Ann R. Eppinger [“Eppinger”] appeals the trial court’s non-final order granting Prager, Sealy & Co. LLC’s [“Prager Sealy”] motion to compel arbitration. Ep-pinger argues that the trial court erred by granting Prager Sealy’s motion to compel arbitration. We agree that the allegations in her complaint do not raise an arbitrable issue and reverse.
Eppinger and Douglas J. Sealy [“Sealy”] joined Prager Sealy’s predecessor in 1991, opening the company’s Orlando office and serving as managing directors. In 1993, Eppinger and Sealy married each other. Both continued their work at the company, but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Charles Zandford v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Incorporated John P. Graner, in His Individual and Representative CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- In Re NEXT Financial Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. StinnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Valentine Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. AgahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pictet Overseas Inc. v. Helvetia TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Grant v. RotolanteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Antony Lee Turbeville v. Department of Financial ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Pictet Overseas Inc. v. Helvetia TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018