Legal Opinion

Diamond International Corp. v. Sullivan & Merritt, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 6, 1985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

The defendant and third-party plaintiff, Diamond International Corporation (Diamond), appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, Kennebec County, holding that a joint tortfeasor is not entitled to a so-called pro tanto reduction of the judgment or cancellation of an assenting employer’s statutory lien for compensation paid under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). Diamond also appeals from the judgment entered in favor, of the third party defendant, Sullivan & Merritt (S & M), on S & M’s motion for a directed verdict on the issue of whether an indemnification agreement…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Correia v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Mulder v. Acme-Cleveland Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ceco Corp. v. ColemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Jerome S. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Haverhill v. George Brox, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. Drake v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Fowler v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re ALL MAINE ASBESTOS LITIGATION (PNS CASES). Petition of UNITED STATES of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API