Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 2011No. COA10-764PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Roger Gene Moore (“defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s order sentencing him for conviction for obtaining property by false pretense and ordering him to pay court costs, restitution, and attorney’s fees. For the following reasons, we vacate the trial court’s order for restitution and find no error in defendant’s trial.

I. Background

• On 5 October 2009, defendant was indicted for obtaining property by false pretense for purporting to rent a house to a tenant when he did not actually own the property. Defendant was tried on this charge at the 2 February 2010 Criminal Session…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. DayeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API