Legal Opinion

State v. Stringer

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 3, 1927No. 28333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Nieel, C. J.

The appellant was convicted of the crime of embezzlement. The charge, specifically, was that, in his employment selling ice, be had collected $25 for his employer and appropriated it to his own use.

Among the bills of exception is one that was reserved to the judge’s refusal to give any of the following special charges requested by defendant’s attorneys, viz.:(1) That, in order to convict the defendant of embezzlement, the state had to prove that a demand was made on him for the money alleged to have been embezzled, or that he actually converted it to his own use.(2) That a failure of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lisso v. DevillierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  2. State v. O'KeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  3. State v. FlournoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NahoumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. State v. DarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Henry Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. State v. TrubySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API